· 4/24/2012
Keckler v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.
Citations
- 967 N.E.2d 18
- 2012 WL 1409265
- 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 196
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, in Indiana, the phrase “arising out of” as used in insurance contracts has long been construed to mean the “efficient and predominating” cause
- discussing how there is “no accepted agreement as to the amount of controlled substances necessary to cause impairment.”
- “Generally, when an insurer wishes to rely upon an exclusionary clause in its policy, it is raising an affirmative defense to coverage and it bears the burden of proving its applicability.”
- “The power to interpret insurance policies does not extend to changing their terms.”
- “[w]e may not rewrite an insurance contract”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Friedlander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.