Skip to main content
· 4/24/2012

Keckler v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 967 N.E.2d 18
  • 2012 WL 1409265
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in Indiana, the phrase “arising out of” as used in insurance contracts has long been construed to mean the “efficient and predominating” cause
  • discussing how there is “no accepted agreement as to the amount of controlled substances necessary to cause impairment.”
  • “Generally, when an insurer wishes to rely upon an exclusionary clause in its policy, it is raising an affirmative defense to coverage and it bears the burden of proving its applicability.”
  • “The power to interpret insurance policies does not extend to changing their terms.”
  • “[w]e may not rewrite an insurance contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.