Skip to main content
· 6/25/1963

Keck v. Pozorski

Citations

  • 191 N.E.2d 325
  • 135 Ind. App. 192
  • 1963 Ind. App. LEXIS 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a joint enterprise existed because the wife owned the vehicle being driven by her husband and both were traveling to work together in order to enhance family finances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.