Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/11/1996
Keaton v. A.B.C. Drug Co.
Citations
- 467 S.E.2d 558
- 266 Ga. 385
- 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 468
- 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 953
- 1996 Ga. LEXIS 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \grasping the product and beginning to take the product from the shelf with the intent to purchase it\ constitutes privity necessary for implied warranty
- “grasping the product and beginning to take the product from the shelf with the intent to purchase it” constitutes privity necessary for implied warranty
- “Georgia law establishes that in order to recover under a theory of breach of implied warranty of merchantability, a plaintiff must have privity with the seller.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham, Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Keaton v. A.B.C. Drug Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.