Keaton and Keaton v. Keaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the law of unfair competition is very broad and not limited to passing off one’s goods and services as those of another
• “[i]n order to state a cognizable claim for trade name infringement, a plaintiff must make a threshold showing of a protectable trade name”
• trade name in- fringement under Indiana law requires showing of a likelihood of confusion
• Indiana-law trademark claims require likelihood \to cause confusion.\
• likelihood of confusion as to source of goods
• discussing Indiana law on unfair competition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).