Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that equitable estoppel may be applied against the federal 18 government (citing Office of Personnel Mgmt. v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 423 (1990))
• agency action “was not arbitrary or capricious” because agency “articulated rational reasons related to its statutory responsibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).