Keating v. 68th & Paxton, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the plaintiff’s suggested inference was speculative, there was no evidence of proximate cause
• holding that the plaintiff’s speculative inference could not serve as the predicate for liability
• finding that “the existence of multiple inferences regarding causation [did] not create a triable issue of fact”
• discussing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commission on questions falling within its expertise, including the existence of an employment relationship
• discussing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commission on questions falling within its expertise, including the existence of an employment relationship
• the nonmoving party “must come forth with some evidence that arguably would entitle him to recover at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).