Kearney v. Succession of Whitehead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he FTC has not established that, but for defendants’ sham litigation, Teva would have launched its product on June 2012 or at any time thereafter.”
• “[T]he FTC has not established that, but for defendants’ sham litigation, Teva would have launched its product on June 2012 or at any time thereafter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).