Kearney v. M'Cullough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the “dominant words” in the contract at issue were “Requirements for Balance of year to Jan 1 1930,” not the estimates that followed, and that “[t]he words ‘Blanket Order’ in the column headed ‘Quantity’ lend further support to this construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).