Keans v. Rankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting caselaw where “the time for removal began to run when the defendant was originally served despite the misnomer”
• post-removal evidence may serve to clarify what amount was in controversy when the case was removed, but not to alter the amount after removal
• “The Tenth Circuit has [] elaborated that, for the thirty-day period to begin to run, this court requires clear and unequivocal notice from the initial pleading itself.”
• “The removing defendant bears the burden of establishing that removal is proper.”
• “New Mexico law permits service to be made upon a designated agent.”
• “the issue boils down to whether [defendant] was properly served”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).