Keady v. Nike, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing defamation claim that asserted “a series of defamatory statements without identifying the substance of those statements, by whom they were made, or to whom they were communicated”
• dismissing claim for breach of employment contract due to constructive discharge because the “plaintiff failed to allege, in nonconclusory language, the provision(s) of the contract upon which liability is predicated.”
• “[W]hile the defamation need not be plead in haec verba, a pleading is only sufficient if it adequately alleges ‘the purported communication, and an indication of who made the communication, when it was made, and to whom it was communicated.’”
• “[W]hile the defamation need not be plead[ed] in haec verba, a pleading is only sufficient if it adequately alleges ‘the purported communication, and an indication of who made the communication, when it was made, and to whom it was communicated.’” (citation omitted)
• discussing 18 U.S.C. § 371
• discussing 18 U.S.C. § 241

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).