Skip to main content

Kea-Ham Contracting, Inc. v. Floyd County Development Authority

Citations

  • 37 S.W.3d 703
  • 2000 WL 1597746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Berns’s “key factor is ... whether, when viewed as a whole, the entity is carrying out a function integral to state government”
  • “Government entities are not protected by sovereign immunity on one project without protection on another by virtue of the source of funding for the particular project.”
  • “Thus the decisive issue here is whether Spurlock, by sending the letter assuring that interim financing was in place, performed a discretionary or a ministerial act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Stumbo, Wintersheimer, Johnstone, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.