Skip to main content
· 8/12/2015

KCP Hastings, LLC, Relator v. County of Dakota

Citations

  • 868 N.W.2d 268
  • 2015 Minn. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the tax court abused its discretion by failing to place any weight on the income approach
  • noting that although both appraisers used the \income approach\ to valuation, one used \a direct-capitalization technique\ to arrive at the income-approach value, while another appraiser used \a discounted cash flow analysis\ to arrive at the income approach to value
  • “The tax court need not accept an appraiser’s valuation in its entirety; instead, it may adjust the calculations based on evidence in the record and its own expertise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.