Kazolias v. IBEW LU 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he governing statute . . . expressly provides that the district court [in reviewing objections to an R&R] ‘may also receive further evidence.’” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1))
• “[T]he governing statute ... expressly jurisdiction over the entire action, because a defect in provides that the district court [in reviewing evidence.’ ” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1))
• “The LMRDA was enacted ‘to encourage democratic self-governance in unions’ as well as ‘to correct widespread abuses of power and instances of corruption by union officials.’” (quoting Franza v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 671, 869 F.2d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 1989))
• “The LMRDA was enacted ‘to encourage democratic self-governance in unions’ as well as ‘to correct widespread abuses of power and instances of corruption by union officials.’” (quoting Franza v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 671, 869 F.2d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 1989))
• applying federal standard to claims brought under NYSHRL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).