Kazmann v. United States Environmental Protection Agency ex rel. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the government need not negate all hypotheses explaining the fingerprint in a manner consistent with innocence”
• “There are a potential multitude of manual manipulations involving the check which would explain the presence of defendant’s fingerprints”
• district court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal where only evidence produced was unexplained presence of fingerprints on uttered check, and no eyewitness or handwriting identification
• “the government need not negate all hypotheses explaining the fingerprint in a manner consistent with innocence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).