Kaylor v. Rankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant officer should have intervened to stop an unlawful arrest from happening, because he had sufficient time to intervene and would have been able to avoid the plaintiffs unlawful arrest
• finding that the defendant officer should have intervened to stop an unlawful arrest from happening, because he had sufficient time to intervene and would have been able to avoid the unlawful arrest of the plaintiff
• finding it is a jury question as to whether crude and rude statements directed to a police officer were protected by the First Amendment
• finding use of pepper spray may have constituted excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment because suspect was unarmed and not perceived as dangerous
• finding under Ohio law, there is a violation of obstruction of official business “only when the manner and context of the boisterous statement prevented a public official from carrying out his or her lawful duty”
• bad faith has been defined as the opposite of good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).