Kaye Associates v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that legislative history clearly favors the majority view, even if restricting removal to defendants produces anomalous results because of state differences with respect to third-party rules
• holding that third-party defendants have no right to remove under § 1441
• “Having considered the arguments on both sides of the issue, we conclude that the better reasoned view is that third-party defendants do not have the right to remove cases to federal courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).