Kay v. Vatterott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party’s possible negligence did not bar its claim for money damages by virtue of “unclean hands” because the party’s “right to proceed ... sounds in the contract between the parties” and not in tort
• concluding that a party’s possible negligence did not bar its claim for money damages by virtue of “unclean hands” because the party’s “right to proceed . . . sounds in the contract between the parties” and not in tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).