Kay v. Kay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court in Berk stated that the master's duty to file a written record of the evidence with his or her report was mandatory
• noting that the Berk decision held that the filing of a transcript of the master's hearing with the report was mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1999-02-08· cited 276×
• De Clements v. De Clements
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-27· cited 27×
• Berkheimer v. Berkheimer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-10· cited 19×
• Petrakis v. Petrakis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-31· cited 9×
• Monyek v. Monyek
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-31· cited 7×
• Wyman v. Wyman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-04· cited 5×
• Fonte v. Alvarez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-30· cited 4×
• Ellett v. Ellett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-30· cited 4×
• Lopez v. Lopez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-10· cited 4×
• Moskowitz v. Moskowitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-13· cited 3×
• Dehler v. Dehler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-27· cited 2×
• Barnett Bank v. RGA DEVELOPMENT CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-28· cited 1×
• Bornstein v. Bornstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-24
• MARIO OLIVA v. IVON OLIVA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-03-15

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Berk v. Berk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-29· cited 10×