Kaweesa v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that petitioner who filed untimely motion to reopen with BIA nonetheless exhausted administrative remedies
• noting that habeas courts have jurisdiction to determine whether hearing officer’s discretionary denial of motion to reopen “falls within the implicit limits set by the statutory scheme and the Constitution”
• stating that “it would strain section 1252’s plain language to conflate judicial remedies and administrative remedies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).