Kaw Valley State Bank v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court “can ignore this corporate fiction when it is invoked to subvert justice”
• “the law treats a corporation as an entirely separate entity from its stockholders, even where one person owns all the corporation’s stock.”
• “the law treats a corporation as an entirely separate entity from its stockholders, even where one person owns all the corporation’s stock.”
• “Traditionally, the ‘basis for piercing the corporate veil has been to protect a corporation's creditors . . . .’”
• “Traditionally, the ‘basis for piercing the corporate veil has been to protect a corporation's creditors . . . .’”
• “Phyllis owned 80 percent and Troy owned 20 percent of both Empower and Hamsa.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).