Skip to main content
· 8/25/2003

Kaw Nation v. Springer

Citations

  • 341 F.3d 1186
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17722
  • 2003 WL 22005982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address moot issue that had no impact on the outcome of the case
  • stating that block grants under NA-HASDA are controlled by HUD
  • stating that block grants under NAHASDA are controlled by HUD
  • stating that block grants under NA-HASDA are controlled by HUD
  • upholding dismissal where no private cause of action existed for violation of a criminal statute preventing the conduct at issue
  • declining to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.