· 8/25/2003
Kaw Nation v. Springer
Citations
- 341 F.3d 1186
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17722
- 2003 WL 22005982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to address moot issue that had no impact on the outcome of the case
- stating that block grants under NA-HASDA are controlled by HUD
- stating that block grants under NAHASDA are controlled by HUD
- stating that block grants under NA-HASDA are controlled by HUD
- upholding dismissal where no private cause of action existed for violation of a criminal statute preventing the conduct at issue
- declining to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.