Kauka Farms, Inc. v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “conduct which [the plaintiff] asserts as ... tortious interference with property right[s] ... is nothing more than allegations of breach of contract”
• discussing Laurens County Bd. of Ed. v. Stanley, 187 Ga. 389 (200 SE 294) (1938)
• finding a description adequate when it did not require \the future exercise of judgment\ but rather \the mechanical following of directions.\
• applying the dictionary definition of \surrounding\ in interpreting a property description
• claim for contractual attorney fees barred because could have been raised in suit on note and security deed even though amount of note was not fixed until judgment
• claim for contractual attorney fees barred because could have been raised in suit on note and security deed even though amount of note was not fixed until judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).