Kauk v. Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a trial court is given wide discretion in supplemental proceedings to protect the rights and interests of all parties
• noting a trial court is given wide discretion in supplemental proceedings to protect the rights and interests of all parties
• “The record in this case indicates that the court below felt that citation proceedings could never be used in a situation where a wage garnishment under the Wage Deduction Act would apply. [T]his is an erroneous view... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).