Kauhane v. Acutron Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, once the plaintiff withdrew his appeal, the circuit court's judgment became final for res judicata purposes
• holding that, once the plaintiff withdrew his appeal, the circuit court’s judgment became final for res judicata purposes
• stating that state circuit court’s judgment became final for res judicata purposes once plaintiff’s appeal withdrawn
• stating that the central criterion to determine an identity of claims is whether the two suits arise “out of the same transactional nucleus of facts”
• doctrine of res judicata serves to conserve judicial resources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).