Skip to main content
· 12/5/2002

Kaufmann v. Morales

Citations

  • 93 S.W.3d 650
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8570
  • 2002 WL 31718600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a notation on a docket sheet setting the case for trial was not sufficient to meet the purpose of Rule 683
  • “There are at least two reasons for requiring a trial date on the [temporary injunction] order. One is to prevent the injunction from becoming permanent.”
  • “There are at least two reasons for requiring a trial date on the [temporary injunction] order. One is to prevent the injunction from becoming permanent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.