Kaufmann v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ may not reject medical opinion merely because 7 it was memorialized in check-box forms that “reflected and were entirely consistent with the 8 hundreds of pages of treatment notes created [by the doctors]”
• noting that a district court 4 may abuse its discretion not to remand for benefits when all of these conditions are 5 met
• courts have the flexibility to remand for further proceedings 10 when the record as a whole creates “serious doubt” as to whether the claimant is 11 disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).