Skip to main content
· 12/20/1910

Kaufman v. Wahl

Citations

  • 83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an issue is previously litigated if “the highest appellate court in which the petitioner could have had review as a matter of right has ruled on the merits of the issue”
  • stating that an issue is previously litigated if \the highest appellate court in which the petitioner could have had review as a matter of right has ruled on the merits of the issue\
  • stating that an issue is previously-litigated if “the highest appellate court in which the petitioner could have had review as a matter of right has ruled on the merits of the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Summers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.