Kaufman v. Kaufman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”
• “Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Douglas'estate
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-01-07· cited 26×
• Estate of Oney
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-02-23· cited 9×
• In Re Matt
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-01-03· cited 6×
• In Re the Estate of Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-05-21· cited 4×
• Hoglund v. Morgan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-11-01· cited 2×
• Edinger v. Edinger
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-10-28· cited 2×
• Altman v. Sigurdson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-12-05· cited 1×
• Culligan v. Old National Bank
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-02-11· cited 1×
• Siverson v. Wallace
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-01-07· cited 1×
• Watson v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-01-03· cited 1×
• Meyer v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-12-27
• Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-08-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Green's Estate
  Washington Supreme Court· 1955-05-19· cited 20×
• Hallin v. Bode
  Washington Supreme Court· 1961-05-25· cited 13×
• In Re Webb's Estate
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-05-24· cited 10×
• O'Connor v. Dunnigan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1913-09-10· cited 10×