Kaufman v. Campeau Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to exercise jurisdiction because acts in the United States were insubstantial in comparison to conduct that allegedly occurred in Canada
• “In short, the conduct alleged to have occurred within the United States has too tenuous a connection with the claims of the Canadian investors to support the exercise of jurisdiction over such claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).