· 8/23/2006
Kaufman v. CA, INC.
Citations
- 905 A.2d 749
- 2006 Del. Ch. LEXIS 156
- 2006 WL 2589418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Section 220 is not meant as a replacement for discovery under Rule 34.”
- “Section 220 is not meant as a replacement for discovery under Rule 34”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.