Kaufman v. Benner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that bespeaks caution doctrine was relevant in determining whether the prospectus as a whole was misleading as a matter of law, where alleged misrepresentations concerned matters of historical fact
• “It is well settled that poor financial performance, standing alone, does not necessarily suggest securities fraud ..., but could also be explained by poor management, general market conditions, or other events unrelated to fraud, creating a jury question on inquiry notice.”
• “It is well settled that poor financial performance, standing alone, does not necessarily suggest securities fraud ..., but could also be explained by poor management, general market conditions, or other events unrelated to fraud, creating a jury question on inquiry notice.”
• “It is well settled that poor financial performance, standing alone, does not necessarily suggest securities fraud ..., but could also be explained by poor management, general market conditions, or other events unrelated to fraud, creating a jury question on inquiry notice.”
• “It is well settled that poor financial performance, standing alone, does not necessarily suggest securities fraud . . . , but could also be explained by poor management, general market conditions, or other events unrelated to fraud, creating a jury question on inquiry notice.”
• “It is well settled that poor financial performance, standing alone, does not necessarily suggest securities fraud . . . , but could also be explained by poor management, general market conditions, or other events unrelated to fraud, creating a jury question on inquiry notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).