Skip to main content
· 5/8/1984

Kaufman v. Belmont

Citations

  • 479 A.2d 282
  • 1984 Del. Ch. LEXIS 412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court will not assume that a director designated by dominant stockholder will fail to perform his fiduciary duties
  • court will not assume that a director designated by dominant stockholder will fail to perform his fiduciary duties
  • “[M]ere approval of a corporate action . . . will not disqualify the director from subsequently considering a pre-suit demand to rectify the challenged transaction.”
  • “A mere allegation of acquiescence without more is insufficient to show breach of fiduciary duty or lack of independence or disinterestedness.”
  • \[M]ere approval of a corporate action . . . will not disqualify the director from subsequently considering a pre- suit demand to rectify the challenged transaction.\ (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.