· 4/20/2010
Kaufman v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Citations
- 601 F.3d 1088
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8131
- 2010 WL 1542638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing this “deferential standard of review,” and stating “that a district court is in the best position to define the scope of the discovery orders and attendant protective orders it issues”
- upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions
- upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions
- affirming district court's sanction ordering attorney to pay fees incurred by opposing party in preparing motion for sanctions premised upon attorney's violation of protective order
- affirming district court’s sanction ordering attorney to pay fees incurred by opposing party in preparing motion for sanctions premised upon attorney’s violation of protective order
- upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Kelly, Tacha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.