Skip to main content
· 4/20/2010

Kaufman v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 601 F.3d 1088
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8131
  • 2010 WL 1542638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing this “deferential standard of review,” and stating “that a district court is in the best position to define the scope of the discovery orders and attendant protective orders it issues”
  • upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions
  • upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions
  • affirming district court's sanction ordering attorney to pay fees incurred by opposing party in preparing motion for sanctions premised upon attorney's violation of protective order
  • affirming district court’s sanction ordering attorney to pay fees incurred by opposing party in preparing motion for sanctions premised upon attorney’s violation of protective order
  • upholding a district court’s determination that a telephone call from a judge’s law clerk to counsel was harmless and warranted no further investigation or sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Kelly, Tacha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.