Skip to main content
· 11/26/1980

Kauffmann v. Baker

Citations

  • 392 So. 2d 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where appellant had moved to reconstruct record in lower court, but failed to do so, and inadequacy of record was raised in answer brief, appellant waived opportunity to supplement record under rule 9.200(f)(2)
  • record insufficient where trial court did not settle any factual differences between the parties or approve any version of the facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beranek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.