Katzman v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner’s contention that he was entitled to resentencing under California Penal Code § 1170.126 did not present federal constitutional claim
• claim regarding alleged right to resentencing under California law 17 not cognizable on federal habeas review
• whether petitioner qualified for resentencing under California statute is 18 solely a matter of state law
• request for resentencing under Cal. Penal Code § 1170.126 28 not federal constitutional claim
• claims challenging state sentencing laws do not implicate a federal constitutional right
• dismissing a habeas petition deemed not cognizable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).