Katz v. Image Innovations Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \magnitude of the fraud\ may \provide[ ] some additional circumstantial evidence of scienter.\
• finding evidence of scienter when accountant booked six million dollars worth of largely non-existent sales
• “Whether a person is a ‘controlling person’ is a fact- intensive inquiry, and generally should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).