Skip to main content

Katz v. Evening Bulletin

Citations

  • 403 A.2d 518
  • 485 Pa. 536
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While appellant admits that this notice was not ‘letter perfect,’ we adopt the reasoning of the Superior Court that ‘a meritorious claim ought not, if possible be defeated for technical reasons and ... technicalities are not looked upon with favor in compensation cases.[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, Larsen, Manderino, Nix, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.