Katz v. Evening Bulletin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While appellant admits that this notice was not ‘letter perfect,’ we adopt the reasoning of the Superior Court that ‘a meritorious claim ought not, if possible be defeated for technical reasons and ... technicalities are not looked upon with favor in compensation cases.[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).