Katz v. Bora Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that insurer seeking to invoke exclusion must “demonstrate that the allegations of the complaint cast that pleading solely and entirely within the policy exclusions, and, further, that the allegations, in toto, are subject to no other interpretation”
• reinstating lower court ruling awarding legal fees and disbursements incurred in defending action insurer wrongfully refused to defend
• “An insurer’s obligation to furnish its insured with a defense is heavy indeed, and, of course, broader than its duty to pay.”
• “The insurer is cloaked 3 with the burden of proving that the incident and claim thereunder came within the 4 exclusions of the policy.”
• “While policy coverage such as the one here involved is often referred to as ‘liability insurance’ it is clear that it is, in fact, ‘litigation insurance’ as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).