E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/2/2000
Katz v. AT & T Corp.
Citations
- 191 F.R.D. 433
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 986
- 2000 WL 190582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[disclosing a communication to a third party unquestionably waives the privilege”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-04-30· cited 182×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-21· cited 68×
- Beneficial Franchise Co. v. Bank One, N.A.N.D. Illinois· 2001-05-08· cited 36×
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-05· cited 36×
- Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-31· cited 32×
- In Re Condemnation by the City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-09-08· cited 24×
- Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-05-03· cited 21×
- Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. North River InsuranceW.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-03-31· cited 19×
- Serrano v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLCW.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-03-06· cited 16×
- Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2003-11-20· cited 15×
- Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.D. Delaware· 2000-07-11· cited 8×
- Power Mosfet Technologies v. Siemens AGE.D. Texas· 2000-10-30· cited 7×
- Atlantic Investment Management, LLC v. Millennium Fund I, Ltd.N.D. Illinois· 2002-08-22· cited 7×
- STI OUTDOOR v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-08-02· cited 6×
- Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.District of Columbia· 2008-09-03· cited 5×
- Corning Inc. v. SRU Biosystems, LLCD. Delaware· 2004-07-07· cited 3×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-05-13· cited 2×
- In re Milo's Kitchen Dog Treats Consolidated CasesW.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-04-14· cited 2×
- Scranton Cultural Center at Masonic Temple v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-04-13· cited 1×
- K.W. Muth Co. v. Bing-Lear Mfg. Group, L.L.C.E.D. Michigan· 2003-09-19· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1994-08-17· cited 319×
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaFederal Circuit· 1996-11-14· cited 119×
- Allendale Mutual Insurance v. Bull Data Systems, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1993-12-03· cited 53×
- In re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management Corp.Third Circuit· 1986-11-13· cited 40×
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.N.D. California· 1987-04-09· cited 31×
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.D. Delaware· 1985-08-12· cited 27×
- Dunhall Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Discus Dental, Inc.C.D. California· 1998-01-27· cited 21×
- Helman v. Murry's Steaks, Inc.D. Delaware· 1990-01-17· cited 17×
- Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. General Electric Co.D. Massachusetts· 1995-04-19· cited 15×
- Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Motor Wheel Corp.W.D. Michigan· 1991-03-25· cited 15×
- Rayman v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan A'ssnD. Nebraska· 1993-05-12· cited 14×
- Giovan v. St. Thomas Diving Club, Inc.Virgin Islands· 1997-06-13· cited 1×
Other cases named Katz v. AT & T Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.