Katz Investment Co. v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts frequently decline to pass upon remote, future, or contingent rights which may never arise, at least where there is no present need for such determination or, because of absence of parties or otherwise, the determination may not be final”
• holding previously contingent remainder vested upon a death
• holding previously contingent remainder vested upon a death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).