Katusha Nurse v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “policy-making defendants’ allegedly negligent and reckless employment, supervision and training” of customs agents “fall squarely within the discretionary function exception”
• holding that “policy-making defendants’ allegedly negligent and reckless employment, supervision and training” of customs agents “fall squarely within the discretionary function exception”
• holding that “the Constitution can limit the discretion of federal officials such that the FTCA’s discretionary function exception will not apply.”
• holding that plaintiff's claims of “negligent and reckless employment, 21 supervision and training of” employees “fall squarely within the discretionary function 22 exception”
• holding that plaintiff’s claims of “negligent and reckless employment, supervision and training of” employees “fall squarely within the discretionary function exception”
• holding that plaintiff’s claims of “negligent and reckless employment, supervision and training of” employees “fall squarely within the discretionary function exception”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).