Katterjohn v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the provision of legal services \from outside New York\ did not establish personal jurisdiction
• holding that Defendants never “projected themselves” into the underlying New York transaction by, for example, “actively and extensively negotiating the [underlying contract] on behalf of Plaintiff in New York in the first instance”
• holding that “the provision of legal services … from outside of New York” is not transacting business in New York, even if “aspects of the underlying transaction … took place in New York or involved New York law,” and collecting similar cases
• “[T]he mere characterization of Defendants’ practice as ‘nationwide’ does not suffice to establish purposeful availment of the privilege of doing business in New York.”
• applying New York law in diversity context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).