Katsantonis v. Freels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appeal was reinstated even though proof of service was not filed within five days as required under Pa.R.C.P.DJ. No. 1005(B)
• appeal was reinstated even though proof of service was not filed within five days as required under Pa.R.C.P.D.J. No. 1005(B)
• transmittal of proof of service to prothonotary by first class mail was not unreasonable and late filing caused by postal delay would be excused
• proof 5 of service being filed one day late was disregarded where notice of appeal was timely served, and good cause was shown
• appeal was reinstated even though proof of service was not filed within five days as required under to seek certiorari review in the court of common pleas.” Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted
• court construed Rule 1005B liberally and reinstated appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).