Skip to main content
· 6/23/1992

Katos v. Cushing

Citations

  • 601 So. 2d 612
  • 1992 WL 138817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding after a review of the record that the alleged erroneous evidentiary ruling did not affect the outcome and was not so prejudicial as to destroy the jury’s impartiality
  • finding test for harmful error regarding evidentiary ruling is whether it altered the outcome of the trial
  • test for harmful error is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Ferguson and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.