Skip to main content
· 6/7/1996

Kato v. County of Westchester

Citations

  • 927 F. Supp. 714
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7857
  • 1996 WL 308955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]liens who have been accorded lawful permanent resident status under the immigration laws are considered aliens ‘admitted for permanent residence,’ while aliens admitted to the United States on temporary nonimmigrant visas are not.”
  • “As a Japanese citizen present in the United States on an E–2 visa, Isao Kato is not admitted for permanent residence in the United States. Therefore, he is treated as an alien for diversity purposes.”
  • “As a Japanese citizen present in the United States on an E–2 visa, Isao Kato is not admitted for permanent residence in the United States. Therefore, he is treated as an alien for diversity purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.