Katie Arsberry v. State of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding dismissal of inmate's First Amendment, due process, and equal protection claims based upon exorbitant—i.e., being far higher than required to cover the costs involved in providing phone service to inmates—telephone rates
• defining the doctrine as one that “allows a court to refer an issue to an agency that knows more about the issue, even if the agency hasn’t been given exclusive jurisdiction to resolve it”
• at the “core” of the weaker version is the idea that “the court has jurisdiction of the case, but the agency of the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).