Kathy Heisler v. Metropolitan Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requesting an accommodation is a protected activity under the ADA
• holding, in the Title I context, a person who was not disabled had a retaliation claim based on their good faith request for accommodation
• finding that a plaintiff restricted from lifting more than 50 pounds and from extensive bending, twisting, and lifting was not substantially limited in the major life activity of working
• finding plaintiff failed to present evidence sufficient to establish that her major depressive disorder was a disability within the meaning of the ADA
• requiring the same for a retaliation claim under the ADA and explaining that this requirement applies to retaliation claims under the MHRA
• “Requesting an accommodation is a protected activity ... and termination is certainly an adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).