Kathryn Strom v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. And Goldman, Sachs & Co. Supplemental Life Insurance Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for a breach of fiduciary duty, restitution would be \equitable relief\ within the meaning of sec. 1132 (a)(3)
• positing that \we must adhere to the Supreme Court's rather emphatic guidance [in Great-West ]\
• noting that ERISA was enacted to create an improved remedial scheme for the benefit of plan participants and beneficiaries
• acknowledging that the district court \explicitly and correctly considered the group policy on the theory that it had been incorporated by reference in the complaint\
• positing that “we must adhere to the Supreme Court’s rather emphatic guidance [in Great-West]”
• noting that a backpay remedy is within the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 referring to appropriate equitable relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).