Kathryn Sheppard v. David Evans and Assoc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's \brief\ complaint alleging disparate treatment, consisting of a few basic facts identifying the grounds of age discrimination, was sufficient to create a \straightforward\ plausible prima facie case
• holding that age discrimination claim 8 was plausibly alleged in a two page complaint that alleged that “(1) she was at least forty years 9 old; (2) ‘her performance was satisfactory or better’ and that ‘she received consistently good 10 performance reviews’ (3
• finding that the 20 plaintiff plausibly alleged the second element where she alleged that her performance was “satisfactory or better” and that “she received consistently good performance reviews”
• reaffirming the application of 2 Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 508–11 (2002), even post Twombly and Iqbal
• setting forth elements of a prima facie case for a discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
• reaffirming the application of Swierkiewicz v. Sorema 17 N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 508–11 (2002) after Twombly and Iqbal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).