Kathrein v. City of Evanston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a “demonstrable reduction in the market value of one’s property is an injury in fact for standing purposes,” rather than a hypothetical reduction in market value
• finding that a “demonstrable reduction in the market value of one’s property is an injury in fact for standing purposes,” as opposed to a hypothetical reduction in market value
• noting that plaintiff bears burden of proving standing
• \A demonstrable reduction in the market value of one's property is an injury in fact for standing purposes.\
• unripe claims must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).